Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.

431 N.E.2d 305, 55 N.Y.2d 675, 446 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3249
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 23, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 431 N.E.2d 305 (Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co., 431 N.E.2d 305, 55 N.Y.2d 675, 446 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3249 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (74 AD2d 940), and question certified answered in the negative. It is noted that we are not here concerned with possible differences between CPLR 317 and 5015, the moving papers on this motion being insufficient to establish a meritorious defense.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Meyer dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judges Gabrielli and FuChsberg concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barone v. Barone
54 Misc. 3d 599 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)
Howlan v. Rosol
139 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Cristo Bros. v. M. Cristo, Inc.
91 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
431 N.E.2d 305, 55 N.Y.2d 675, 446 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogel-v-asgrow-mandeville-co-ny-1981.