Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.
This text of 431 N.E.2d 305 (Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (74 AD2d 940), and question certified answered in the negative. It is noted that we are not here concerned with possible differences between CPLR 317 and 5015, the moving papers on this motion being insufficient to establish a meritorious defense.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Meyer dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judges Gabrielli and FuChsberg concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 N.E.2d 305, 55 N.Y.2d 675, 446 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vogel-v-asgrow-mandeville-co-ny-1981.