Vlock v. White

90 So. 2d 113
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 24, 1956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point in the case is whether or not appellant violated the usury statutes. The record and briefs have been examined and the judgment appealed from appears to be controlled by and is affirmed on authority of Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199, 169 So. 750; Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Ass’n, 152 Fla. 321, 11 So.2d 570, and Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co., Fla., 84 So.2d 697.

Affirmed.

DREW, C, J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vlock v. White, 90 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1956).

90 So. 2d 113 (Vlock v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert
169 So. 750 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Association
11 So. 2d 570 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co.
84 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)