Vlock v. White

Supreme Court of Florida

Vlock v. White

90 So. 2d 113

DecidedOctober 24, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 90 So. 2d 113 (Vlock v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vlock v. White, 90 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point in the case is whether or not appellant violated the usury statutes. The record and briefs have been examined and the judgment appealed from appears to be controlled by and is affirmed on authority of Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199, 169 So. 750; Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Ass’n, 152 Fla. 321, 11 So.2d 570, and Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co., Fla., 84 So.2d 697.

Affirmed.

DREW, C, J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only point in the case is whether or not appellant violated the usury statutes. The record and briefs have been examined and the judgment appealed from appears to be controlled by and is affirmed on authority of Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199, 169 So. 750; Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Ass’n, 152 Fla. 321, 11 So.2d 570, and Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co., Fla., 84 So.2d 697.

Affirmed.

DREW, C, J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 So. 2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vlock-v-white-fla-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack