The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert
This text of 169 So. 750 (The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this cause Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Presiding Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel.
Hampton, v. McClung,
Affirmed.
WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 So. 750, 125 Fla. 199, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-richter-jewelry-co-v-schweinert-fla-1935.