Vlasic Foods Company v. Russek

Michigan Supreme Court

Vlasic Foods Company v. Russek

170 N.W.2d 827, 382 Mich. 544, 1969 Mich. LEXIS 125

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 1969·No. Calendar 11, Docket 51,849·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

[559]*559Black, J.

(concurring in reversal). I agree fully with that portion of Justice Adams’ opinion commencing with the sentence “Plaintiff originally sued defendants in municipal court as individuals” (ante at 556), and continuing to hut not including the final paragraph thereof.

The order entered by the Court of Appeals, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, should be reversed with remand of the record to circuit for trial of the merits of the plaintiff’s cause as pleaded against the defendants. All costs should abide the final result.

T. E. Brennan, C. J., concurred with Black, J. T. G. Kavanagh, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[559]*559Black, J.

(concurring in reversal). I agree fully with that portion of Justice Adams’ opinion commencing with the sentence “Plaintiff originally sued defendants in municipal court as individuals” (ante at 556), and continuing to hut not including the final paragraph thereof.

The order entered by the Court of Appeals, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, should be reversed with remand of the record to circuit for trial of the merits of the plaintiff’s cause as pleaded against the defendants. All costs should abide the final result.

T. E. Brennan, C. J., concurred with Black, J. T. G. Kavanagh, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Vlasic Foods Company v. Russek, 170 N.W.2d 827, 382 Mich. 544, 1969 Mich. LEXIS 125 (Mich. 1969).

Pincite

170 N.W.2d 827 (Vlasic Foods Company v. Russek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related