Vlahovich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Vlahovich v. State

788 So. 2d 245, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1128, 2001 WL 617537

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 7, 2001

DocketNo. SC00-1073

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 788 So. 2d 245 (Vlahovich v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vlahovich v. State, 788 So. 2d 245, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1128, 2001 WL 617537 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Vlahovich v. State, 757 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We partially quash the decision of the district court below only as it relates to the petitioner’s sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000). We approve the decision of the district court regarding the petitioner’s conviction for resisting arrest with violence.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Vlahovich v. State, 757 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We partially quash the decision of the district court below only as it relates to the petitioner’s sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000). We approve the decision of the district court regarding the petitioner’s conviction for resisting arrest with violence.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 So. 2d 245, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1128, 2001 WL 617537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vlahovich-v-state-fla-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack