V.L. Walker Co. v. Pugh

735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 1999 WL 542607
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1999·No. No. 98-1797·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gupton v. Village Key & Saw Shop Inc., 656 So.2d 475, 478 (Fla.1995)(party cannot successfully complain about an error for which it is responsible.); Markham v. Fogg, 458 So.2d 1122, 1126 (Fla. 1984)(appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact as long as there is competent substantial evidence); City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1958)(trial judge has discretion in balancing the equities between pai'ties in cases involving equitable accounting); Zerquera v. Centennial Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc., 721 So.2d 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(in a bench trial, judge’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence); Dreyfuss v. Dreyfuss, 701 So.2d 437, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(appellate court has the duty to affirm trial court findings supported by competent substantial evidence); Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(trial court must evaluate and weigh conflicting testimony after observing the credibility of the witness).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

V.L. Walker Co. v. Pugh, 735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 1999 WL 542607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

735 So. 2d 1290 (V.L. Walker Co. v. Pugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romero-Saavedra v. State
735 So. 2d 1290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)