V.L. Walker Co. v. Pugh
This text of 735 So. 2d 1290 (V.L. Walker Co. v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Gupton v. Village Key & Saw Shop Inc., 656 So.2d 475, 478 (Fla.1995)(party cannot successfully complain about an error for which it is responsible.); Markham v. Fogg, 458 So.2d 1122, 1126 (Fla. 1984)(appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact as long as there is competent substantial evidence); City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1958)(trial judge has discretion in balancing the equities between pai'ties in cases involving equitable accounting); Zerquera v. Centennial Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc., 721 So.2d 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(in a bench trial, judge’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless totally unsupported by competent and substantial evidence); Dreyfuss v. Dreyfuss, 701 So.2d 437, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(appellate court has the duty to affirm trial court findings supported by competent substantial evidence); Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(trial court must evaluate and weigh conflicting testimony after observing the credibility of the witness).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10074, 1999 WL 542607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vl-walker-co-v-pugh-fladistctapp-1999.