Romero-Saavedra v. State

735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 WL 542582
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 1999
Docket97-3449
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 735 So. 2d 1290 (Romero-Saavedra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romero-Saavedra v. State, 735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 WL 542582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

735 So.2d 1290 (1999)

Alba L. ROMERO-SAAVEDRA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-3449.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 28, 1999.

Alba L. Romero-Saavedra, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Lara J. Edelstein, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was arrested and ultimately charged by the state with trafficking in illegal drugs. At the time of her arrest, she was in possession of $1,462 in currency which was seized as the evidence by law enforcement officials. The appellant pled guilty to the charge on January 9, 1997. On August 13, 1997, eight months after the conclusion of the criminal proceeding, the appellant filed her petition for the return of her currency. The trial court's denial of this petition prompted this appeal.

We affirm the lower court's denial of the petition because it was untimely filed pursuant to section 705.105(1), Florida Statutes *1291 (1997). That statute specifically provides that:

Title to unclaimed evidence or unclaimed tangible personal property lawfully seized pursuant to a lawful investigation in the custody of the court or clerk of the court from a criminal proceeding or seized as evidence by and in the custody of a law enforcement agency shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding.

Thus, where the appellant failed to file her petition within sixty days after the conclusion of the criminal proceeding, title to the currency properly vested with the law enforcement agency.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. State
230 So. 3d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Holmes v. State
997 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Sarmiento v. State
816 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
735 So. 2d 1290, 1999 WL 542582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romero-saavedra-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.