Vivian Calhoun, Deborah Birt, Intervenors-Appellants, Emma Armour, Intervenors-Appellants v. Ed S. Cook

525 F.2d 1203, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11212
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 31, 1975·No. 74--2784·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Petitions for Rehearing are denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petitions for Rehearing En Banc .are denied.

Plaintiff-appellants assert that our holding is inconsonant with the rule of Davis v. School Commissioners of Mobile County, 402 U.S. 33, 37, 91 S.Ct. 1289, 1292, 28 L.Ed.2d 577 (1971), requiring “every effort to achieve the greatest possible degree of actual desegregation, taking into account the practicalities of the situation” and the rule of United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966), affirmed en banc 380 F.2d 385, 389 (1967), that “public schools in this circuit have the affirmative duty under the Fourteenth Amendment to bring about an integrated, unitary school system in which there are no Negro schools and no white schools — just schools.”

These assertions are inaccurate. This panel could not and does not depart from prior precedents. It would blink reality and authority, however, to hold the Atlanta School System to be nonunitary because further racial integration is theoretically possible and we expressly decline to do so. See Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education, D.C., 377 F.Supp. 1123, affirmed 511 F.2d 1374 (5th Cir.), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied 511 F.2d at 1390 (June 27, 1975), cert. denied - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 394, 46 L.Ed.2d 303 (Nov. 17, 1975). We also judicially notice the corresponding declaration of unitary status by Judge Herbert W. Christenberry relating *1204 to the Orleans Parish School System. Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, Civ.Ac.No. 3630 (E.D.La., August 22, 1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vivian Calhoun, Deborah Birt, Intervenors-Appellants, Emma Armour, Intervenors-Appellants v. Ed S. Cook, 525 F.2d 1203, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11212 (5th Cir. 1975).

525 F.2d 1203 (Vivian Calhoun, Deborah Birt, Intervenors-Appellants, Emma Armour, Intervenors-Appellants v. Ed S. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
57 F. Supp. 2d 228 (W.D. North Carolina, 1999)
Stell v. BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUC. FOR CITY OF SAVANNAH
860 F. Supp. 1563 (S.D. Georgia, 1994)
Brown v. Board Of Education Of Topeka
892 F.2d 851 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)
Brown v. Board of Education
892 F.2d 851 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Stell v. Bd. of Public Educ. of City of Savannah
724 F. Supp. 1384 (S.D. Georgia, 1988)
Morgan v. Nucci
831 F.2d 313 (First Circuit, 1987)
Davis v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
721 F.2d 1425 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Delores Ross v. Houston Independent School District
699 F.2d 218 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District
541 F. Supp. 904 (S.D. Mississippi, 1981)
Tasby v. Wright
520 F. Supp. 683 (N.D. Texas, 1981)
Society for Good Will to Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey
466 F. Supp. 722 (E.D. New York, 1979)
Bradley v. Milliken
460 F. Supp. 299 (E.D. Michigan, 1978)
Tasby v. Estes
572 F.2d 1010 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Liddell v. Caldwell
546 F.2d 768 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)