Viser v. Viser

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Viser v. Viser

131 So. 2d 68, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1156

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 1, 1961

DocketNo. 9528

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 So. 2d 68 (Viser v. Viser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viser v. Viser, 131 So. 2d 68, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1156 (La. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This suit was instituted by plaintiff praying for judgment granting a divorce “a vinculo matrimonii,” on the ground of two years separation. Defendant made no appearance on trial of the case but perfected a suspensive appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Before this court appellant has made no appearance, and, on the basis of well established jurisprudence, her appeal must be considered abandoned. Additionally, and as the basis for similar action which may be indicated in the future, we call attention to Rule VII, Section 4(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S., providing that the court may, ex proprio motu :

“Consider abandoned and dismiss the appeal in any case in which the appellant has neither appeared nor filed brief prior to the date fixed for submission of the case.” Cf. Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc., La.App., 128 So.2d 443.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI