Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 F.3d 1363
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 16, 2018·No. 17-1131·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VIRNETX INC., Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________

2017-1131, 2017-1132, 2017-1186, 2017-1274, 2017-1275, 2017-1276, 2017-1291 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00810, IPR2015-00811, IPR2015-00812, IPR2015-00866, IPR2015-00868, IPR2015-00870, IPR2015-00871. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, DANIEL ZEILBERGER.

JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN S. MAMMEN; SCOTT BORDER, JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc. (Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.