Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.
This text of Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc. (Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
VIRNETX INC., Appellant
v.
APPLE INC., Appellee ______________________
2017-1131, 2017-1132, 2017-1186, 2017-1274, 2017-1275, 2017-1276, 2017-1291 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00810, IPR2015-00811, IPR2015-00812, IPR2015-00866, IPR2015-00868, IPR2015-00870, IPR2015-00871. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, DANIEL ZEILBERGER.
JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN S. MAMMEN; SCOTT BORDER, JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virnetx-inc-v-apple-inc-cafc-2018.