Virgie Lee Valley, United States of America, Intervenor v. Rapides Parish School Board, a Corporation v. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana

169 F.3d 216, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 1999
Docket97-30323
StatusPublished

This text of 169 F.3d 216 (Virgie Lee Valley, United States of America, Intervenor v. Rapides Parish School Board, a Corporation v. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Virgie Lee Valley, United States of America, Intervenor v. Rapides Parish School Board, a Corporation v. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, 169 F.3d 216, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341 (5th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

169 F.3d 216

133 Ed. Law Rep. 689

Virgie Lee VALLEY, et al., Plaintiffs,
United States of America, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Appellant.

No. 97-30323.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 26, 1999.

Gregory Bryan Friel, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Mark L. Gross, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert L. Hammonds, Hammonds & Sills, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

James Carl Hrdlicka, Baton Rouge, LA, Gina Puleio Campo, Bolinger & Walker, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Nauman S. Scott, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 26, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 145 F.3d 329).

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F.3d 216, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/virgie-lee-valley-united-states-of-america-intervenor-v-rapides-parish-ca5-1999.