Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

Fifth Circuit

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

169 F.3d 216

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 97-30323·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN [217]*217BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN [217]*217BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board, 169 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

169 F.3d 216 (Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related