Vinson v. Vinson
189 S.W.3d 651, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 492, 2006 WL 998093
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vinson v. Vinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1556 →
Opinion
ORDER
Respondent husband appeals from a judgment entering a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, and does not erroneously declare or misapply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for [652]*652their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vinson v. Vinson, 189 S.W.3d 651, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 492, 2006 WL 998093 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
189 S.W.3d 651 (Vinson v. Vinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)