Vinson v. Vinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vinson v. Vinson

189 S.W.3d 650, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 998089

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 2006

DocketNos. ED 86117, ED 86125

StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.W.3d 650 (Vinson v. Vinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vinson v. Vinson, 189 S.W.3d 650, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 998089 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.W.3d 650, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 493, 2006 WL 998089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vinson-v-vinson-moctapp-2006.