Vincenzo v. Newhart

227 N.E.2d 627, 11 Ohio St. 2d 63, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 67, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 333
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 28, 1967·No. No. 40665·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals opinion, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Tapt, C. J., ZimmeRMAn, Teoop, O’Neill, Hebbebt, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Troop, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincenzo v. Newhart, 227 N.E.2d 627, 11 Ohio St. 2d 63, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 67, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 333 (Ohio 1967).

227 N.E.2d 627 (Vincenzo v. Newhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moser v. Moser
595 N.E.2d 518 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)
Hollis v. Finger
590 N.E.2d 784 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
In re Estate of Wallace
7 Ohio App. Unrep. 112 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
Huzjak v. United States
118 F.R.D. 61 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)
Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.
285 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1972)
Mattson v. Pennsylvania Railroad
43 F.R.D. 523 (N.D. Ohio, 1967)