Vincenzo v. Newhart

227 N.E.2d 627, 11 Ohio St. 2d 63, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 67, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 333
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 28, 1967
DocketNo. 40665
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 227 N.E.2d 627 (Vincenzo v. Newhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincenzo v. Newhart, 227 N.E.2d 627, 11 Ohio St. 2d 63, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 67, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 333 (Ohio 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals opinion, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Tapt, C. J., ZimmeRMAn, Teoop, O’Neill, Hebbebt, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Troop, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moser v. Moser
595 N.E.2d 518 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)
Hollis v. Finger
590 N.E.2d 784 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
In re Estate of Wallace
7 Ohio App. Unrep. 112 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
Huzjak v. United States
118 F.R.D. 61 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)
Woelfling v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.
285 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1972)
Mattson v. Pennsylvania Railroad
43 F.R.D. 523 (N.D. Ohio, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 627, 11 Ohio St. 2d 63, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 67, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincenzo-v-newhart-ohio-1967.