Vincent v. Vincent

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vincent v. Vincent

507 So. 2d 774, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8441

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1830

StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 774 (Vincent v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vincent v. Vincent, 507 So. 2d 774, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8441 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the husband failed to request an award of special equity, Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So.2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Stetson v. Stetson, 356 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); see Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984), and failed to prove his entitlement to a special equity, see Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Smith v. Smith, 428 So.2d 276, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (on rehearing), we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage granting the husband a special equity in various assets. Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised by appellant.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the husband failed to request an award of special equity, Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So.2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Stetson v. Stetson, 356 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); see Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984), and failed to prove his entitlement to a special equity, see Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Smith v. Smith, 428 So.2d 276, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (on rehearing), we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage granting the husband a special equity in various assets. Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised by appellant.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 So. 2d 774, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-vincent-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack