Gleason v. Gleason

453 So. 2d 941, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1782, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 1984·No. No. 83-2441·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution of marriage action, the court awarded to the husband the wife’s interest in a jointly owned money market account. The husband had not sought such relief. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the judgment relating to the award of the wife’s interest in the fund. Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

We affirm the remaining provisions of the judgment. While we would not necessarily have made the same provisions for the wife re alimony and equitable division of the marital home, nevertheless we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.

GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., and SCOTT, ROBERT C., Associate Judge, concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So. 2d 941, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1782, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 941 (Gleason v. Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. McDonald
732 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Wallace v. Wallace
605 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Vincent v. Vincent
507 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Brinkley v. Brinkley
453 So. 2d 941 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)