Vincent v. State
271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1551, 2008 WL 5447593
Opinion
ORDER
Brian Carl Vincent appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vincent v. State, 271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1551, 2008 WL 5447593 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
271 S.W.3d 64 (Vincent v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mohammad v. State
271 S.W.3d 64 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)