Mohammad v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mohammad v. State

271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 2008 WL 5447610

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 18, 2008

DocketED 90635

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 271 S.W.3d 64 (Mohammad v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohammad v. State, 271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 2008 WL 5447610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*65 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hashim Khalid Mohammad appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*65 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hashim Khalid Mohammad appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 2008 WL 5447610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammad-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack