Mohammad v. State
271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 2008 WL 5447610
Opinion
*65 ORDER
Hashim Khalid Mohammad appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mohammad v. State, 271 S.W.3d 64, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1549, 2008 WL 5447610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
271 S.W.3d 64 (Mohammad v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vincent v. State
271 S.W.3d 64 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)