Home/Supreme Court/Vincent v. California

Vincent v. California

149 U.S. 648, 13 S. Ct. 960, 37 L. Ed. 884, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2334
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 15, 1893
Docket1,316
StatusPublished

This text of 149 U.S. 648 (Vincent v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent v. California, 149 U.S. 648, 13 S. Ct. 960, 37 L. Ed. 884, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2334 (1893).

Opinion

149 U.S. 648 (1893)

VINCENT
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 1316.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted May 1, 1893.
Decided May 15, 1893.

*649 Mr. William H.H. Hart, Attorney General of the State of California, for the motion to dismiss.

Mr. Carroll Cook opposing.

This case, which will be found reported in 95 California, 425, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vincent v. California
149 U.S. 648 (Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 U.S. 648, 13 S. Ct. 960, 37 L. Ed. 884, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-v-california-scotus-1893.