Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v. Omni Indem. Co.

74 Misc. 3d 131(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50145(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 2022
Docket2018-1470 K C
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 Misc. 3d 131(A) (Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v. Omni Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v. Omni Indem. Co., 74 Misc. 3d 131(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50145(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v Omni Indem. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 50145(U)) [*1]

Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v Omni Indem. Co.
2022 NY Slip Op 50145(U) [74 Misc 3d 131(A)]
Decided on February 18, 2022
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on February 18, 2022
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2018-1470 K C

Vincent Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of Marven Marcelus, Respondent,

against

Omni Indemnity Company, Appellant.


Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Oleg Rybak of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Rosemarie Montalbano, J.), entered June 19, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground, among others, that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

For the reasons stated in Vincent Med. Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Gederson Gedeon v Omni Indem. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2022 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2018-1277 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

ALIOTTA, P.J., and GOLIA, J., concur.

ELLIOT, J., taking no part.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: February 18, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v. Omni Indem. Co.
74 Misc. 3d 131(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Misc. 3d 131(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50145(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-med-servs-pc-v-omni-indem-co-nyappterm-2022.