Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00491-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
VINCENT KRUSSOW, Appellant,
v.
MARTIN G. ANGUIANO, JR., VALERIE NICOLE VALDEZ, AND NANCY ANN FLORES, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. Appellant’s
motion indicates the matter is still pending in the trial court and requests that this Court
disregard and dismiss all of appellant’s motions and attempted appeal. On December 20, 2020, this Court issued an Order of Abatement instructing the
trial court to determine if appellant desires to prosecute the appeal along with other
matters related to the record.
The Court, having considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that
the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Therefore, this cause is hereby
reinstated, appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the cause dismissed.
Furthermore, appellant’s motion to temporarily suspend appeal venue is hereby
dismissed as moot. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)
(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
NORA L. LONGORIA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of February, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores (Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.