Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores
This text of Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores (Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00491-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
VINCENT KRUSSOW, Appellant,
v.
MARTIN G. ANGUIANO, JR., VALERIE NICOLE VALDEZ, AND NANCY ANN FLORES, Appellees.
On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam The cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to appoint counsel. The Texas
Legislature has provided for the possibility of appointed counsel in civil matters by
conferring upon a district court judge the discretion to “appoint counsel to attend to the
cause of a party who makes an affidavit that he is too poor to employ counsel to attend
to the cause.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §24.016 (West, Westlaw through 2013 C.S.). Under
exceptional circumstances, “the public and private interests at stake [may be] such that
the administration of justice may best be served by appointing a lawyer to represent an
indigent civil litigant.” Travelers Indem. Co. v. Mayfield, 923 S.W.2d 590, 594 (Tex. 1996).
Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court
for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a
hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:
1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal;
2. Whether appellant is indigent;
3. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his or her indigency;
4. Whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel; and,
5. What orders, if any should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant's appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the appeal will be diligently pursued.
If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal and
that appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall
appoint counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If counsel is appointed, the name,
address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall
be included in an order appointing counsel. The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of
any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental
reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 30th day of December, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vincent-krussow-v-martin-g-anguiano-jr-valerie-nicole-valdez-and-texapp-2020.