Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney. Read the opinion of the Court — 454 F. App'x 149
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2014·No. 13-2084·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2084

VINCENT JOHN HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DURON BURNEY, Officer; TOWN OF MAXTON; TAMMY DEESE; GLADYS DEAN,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

MAXTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00184-BO)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina, Andrew James Santaniello, CLAWSON & STAUBES, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Hall’s motion for appointment of counsel

and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall

v. Burney, No. 7:10-cv-00184-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney, (4th Cir. 2014).

Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney (Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related