Vincent Hall v. Duron Burney

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1333

VINCENT JOHN HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER DURON BURNEY; TOWN OF MAXTON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MAXTON POLICE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00184-BO)

Submitted: June 28, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, THE MITCHELL LAW GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Andrew James Santaniello, CLAWSON & STAUBES, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent John Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion seeking $5000 in damages in his ongoing

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Hall seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED