Villars v. Bondi

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 JANVIER VILLARS, 10 Case No. 25-cv-04239-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY 12 RELIEF AND DISMISSING CASE PAM BONDI, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 16 Plaintiff Villars files a motion seeking declaratory relief, a temporary restraining order 17 preventing any enforcement of a judgment against him in the state of Florida, a preliminary 18 injunction against unknown defendants “pending full adjudication of [his] claims,” reassignment 19 of this matter, en banc review of this matter “under Ninth Circuit Rules and Article III 20 constitutional authority,” and “any such further equitable relief this Court deems just and 21 necessary.” Dkt. No. 41. 22 Plaintiff is not entitled to any of the above because his operative complaint was dismissed. 23 See Dkt. No. 37. Without an operative complaint, he cannot seek any form of relief from this 24 Court. For example, Plaintiff cannot meet the standard for a temporary restraining order nor a 25 preliminary injunction because his dismissed complaint has no chance of success. See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (“A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction 26 must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits.”). 27 1 Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Dkt. No. 27. He did not file an amended 2 || complaint, and the time for doing so has expired. See id. Because Plaintiff has not filed a 3 complaint under which relief could potentially be granted, his case is dismissed. The Clerk is 4 || directed to close this matter. 5 6 || ITISSO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: August 13, 2025 9 RICHARD SEEBORG 10 Chief United States District Judge 11 12

© 15 16

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING MOTION AND DISMISSING CASE CASE No. 25-cv-04239-RS