Village of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc.
This text of 225 N.E.2d 547 (Village of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. Since the contract herein is invalid and void (see Scarborough Props. Corp. v. Village of Briarcliff Manor, 278 N. Y. 370), the arbitration clause therein falls with the contract and is unenforcible. Reimbursement for the installation of utilities in the streets to be dedicated to the village was not provided for in the manner prescribed by Village Law (§ 89, subd. 61), and there was a failure to provide for the payment of the village’s obligations under this contract in any one of the modes prescribed by former section 128-b of the Village Law (now § 126, subd. 2).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Taking no part: Judge Keating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 N.E.2d 547, 19 N.Y.2d 660, 278 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/village-of-tarrytown-v-woodland-lake-estates-inc-ny-1967.