Vilgenalt Sanon v. Latoya Riley
This text of Vilgenalt Sanon v. Latoya Riley (Vilgenalt Sanon v. Latoya Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ July 22, 2019
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A19A2348. VILGENALT SANON v. LATOYA RILEY.
Following the dismissal of all claims in this civil case, the defendant, Vilgenalt Sanon, filed a motion for attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14. The trial court denied the motion, and Sanon filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Appeals from orders granting or denying attorney fees and litigation expenses under OCGA § 9-15-14 must be made by discretionary application, not direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10). Sanon’s failure to comply with the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Capricorn Systems v. Godavarthy, 253 Ga. App. 840 (560 SE2d 730) (2002); Jones v. Padgett, 186 Ga. App. 362, 363 (2) (367 SE2d 88) (1988). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/22/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vilgenalt Sanon v. Latoya Riley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vilgenalt-sanon-v-latoya-riley-gactapp-2019.