Video Trax, Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A.

205 F.3d 1358, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3777, 2000 WL 274977
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 14, 2000·No. 99-4007·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The facts and procedural history of this case are set out in the district court’s opinion reported at 33 F.Supp.2d 1041 (S.D.Fla.1998). For the reasons stated by the district court, id. at 1047-55 (part III.A. through III.C.), we find that the fees at issue do not constitute “interest” for purposes of the usury provisions of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85-86 (1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Video Trax, Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A., 205 F.3d 1358, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3777, 2000 WL 274977 (11th Cir. 2000).

205 F.3d 1358 (Video Trax, Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGee v. Bank of America, N.A.
674 F. App'x 958 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
Feld v. Apple Bank for Savings
116 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Synovus Bank v. Griner
739 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
½ Price Checks Cashed v. United Automobile Insurance Co.
344 S.W.3d 378 (Texas Supreme Court, 2011)
Quality Bank v. Cavett
2010 ND 183 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2010)