Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.

448 N.E.2d 1350, 58 N.Y.2d 1026, 462 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2963
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 23, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by76 cases

This text of 448 N.E.2d 1350 (Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc., 448 N.E.2d 1350, 58 N.Y.2d 1026, 462 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2963 (N.Y. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint and to reinstate the complaint in its entirety and, as so modified, should be affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

Justice Sandler’s analysis (85 AD2d 448, 457) of our holding in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Enco Assoc. (43 NY2d 389; see, also, Steiner v Wenning, 43 NY2d 831; Matter of Paver & Wildfoerster [Catholic High School Assn.], 38 NY2d 669) is correct: an action for failure to exercise due care in the performance of a contract insofar as it seeks recovery for damages to property or pecuniary interests recoverable in a contract action is governed by the six-year contract Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213, subd 2). To the extent that Gilbert Props. v Millstein (33 NY2d 857) and Adler & Topal v Exclusive Envelope Corp. (84 AD2d 365) are to the contrary they should not be followed.

[1029]*1029Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Question certified answered in the negative.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson & Bailey, LLC v. Whitmore Group, Ltd.
34 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.
749 N.E.2d 161 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
MATTHEWS AND FIELDS LUMBER CO. v. New England Ins. Co.
113 F. Supp. 2d 574 (W.D. New York, 2000)
Gebhardt v. Allspect, Inc.
96 F. Supp. 2d 331 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Schweizer v. Mulvehill
93 F. Supp. 2d 376 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Levine v. Advest, Inc.
714 A.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Murphy v. Kuhn
682 N.E.2d 972 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & Wexler
958 F. Supp. 907 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Durkin v. Shea
957 F. Supp. 1360 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Hirsch v. Weisman
189 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Walsh v. Maryland Bank, N.A.
806 F. Supp. 437 (S.D. New York, 1992)
MTG Enterprises, Inc. v. Berkowitz
182 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.
586 N.E.2d 1014 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Krouner v. Koplovitz
175 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Golub v. Baer, Marks & Upham
172 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.
164 A.D.2d 149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Kupplungbau GmbH v. Lerner
166 A.D.2d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 N.E.2d 1350, 58 N.Y.2d 1026, 462 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/video-corp-of-america-v-frederick-flatto-associates-inc-ny-1983.