Victory v. Fitzpatrick

8 Ind. 281
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 1856·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action to recover damages for an allege'd trespass upon the plaintiff s land. The record shows the alleged trespass to have been an entry, by the Dvansville and Indianapolis Railroad Company, pursuant to a location of their railroad under their charter, for the purpose of constructing said road' upon the location made.

The suit cannot he, sustained/ The statute provides a mode of redress and it must be followed. New Albany and Salem Railroad Company v. Connelly, 7 Ind. R. 82, and case cited. The President, &c., of the Crawfordsville, &c., Railroad Company v, Wright, 5 Ind. R. 252.

The judgment is reversed with’ costs. Cause remanded, with an order that it be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victory v. Fitzpatrick, 8 Ind. 281 (Ind. 1856).

8 Ind. 281 (Victory v. Fitzpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.
115 N.E.2d 734 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
Million v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
172 N.E. 569 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1930)
Board of Commissioners v. Adler
133 N.E. 602 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. Swinney
97 Ind. 586 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Commissioners v. Bank
32 Ohio St. (N.S.) 194 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1877)