Vicari v. Spiegel

973 A.2d 410, 601 Pa. 378, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 982

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vicari v. Spiegel. Read the opinion of the Court — 605 Pa. 381 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 2009·No. Petition No. 638 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medi[379]*379cal Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medi[379]*379cal Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Vicari v. Spiegel, 973 A.2d 410, 601 Pa. 378, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 982 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 410 (Vicari v. Spiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.