Vicari v. Spiegel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Vicari v. Spiegel

973 A.2d 408

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 27, 2009

Docket661 EAL 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 408 (Vicari v. Spiegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vicari v. Spiegel, 973 A.2d 408 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day May 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day May 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 A.2d 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vicari-v-spiegel-pa-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack