Vicari v. Spiegel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Vicari v. Spiegel

973 A.2d 408

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 661 EAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day May 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*409 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day May 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether respondent’s medical oncology expert was qualified to render standard of care opinions against an otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist under Section 512 of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act, 40 P.S. § 1303.512.

Vicari v. Spiegel, 973 A.2d 408 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 408 (Vicari v. Spiegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related