Viana v. Gonzales
This text of 132 F. App'x 733 (Viana v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER •
The BIA had no authority to issue an order removing Rosales-Viana to Colombia. See Molina-Camacho v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 937 (9th Cir.2004); Salvatierra-Cermeno v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.2005). Because 8 U.S.C. § 1252 only gives this court jurisdiction to review final orders of removal, we lack jurisdiction to review Rosales-Viana’s petition for review.
We therefore construe the case as a petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and transfer it to the United States District Court of Nevada, Las Vegas. See Molina-Camacho, 393 F.3d at 942; 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Upon transfer, Rosales-Viana may make any necessary amendments to perfect the form of his petition.
TRANSFERRED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 F. App'x 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viana-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.