Hugo Rene Salvatierra-Cermeno v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General

404 F.3d 1119, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6334, 2005 WL 927414
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2005·No. 03-72059·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We vacated submission in this case pending the resolution of Molina-Camacho v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 937 (9th Cir.2004), and now order this case submitted.

The BIA had no authority to issue an order removing Salvatierra-Cermeño to Guatemala. See Molina-Camacho, 393 F.3d at 941. However, because 8 U.S.C. § 1252 gives us jurisdiction to review only final orders of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider Salvatierra-Cermeno’s petition for review. We therefore treat the petition as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and transfer it to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix Division. See Molina-Camacho, 393 F.3d at 942; 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Upon transfer, Salvatierra-Cermeño may make any necessary amendments to perfect the form of the petition.

TRANSFERRED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hugo Rene Salvatierra-Cermeno v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 404 F.3d 1119, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6334, 2005 WL 927414 (9th Cir. 2005).

404 F.3d 1119 (Hugo Rene Salvatierra-Cermeno v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Viana v. Gonzales
132 F. App'x 733 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Nkele v. Gonzales
128 F. App'x 667 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Partida-Serrano v. Gonzales
131 F. App'x 112 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)