VFW Post 1238 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

VFW Post 1238 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

678 N.E.2d 946, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1825

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 2, 1997

Docket96-1270

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 678 N.E.2d 946 (VFW Post 1238 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

VFW Post 1238 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 678 N.E.2d 946, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1825 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Huron App. No. H-95-065. This cause, here on certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Huron County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. The court finds that the record establishes that the notice of appeal from the trial court to the court of appeals was not filed within the time prescribed by App.R. 4(A). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for want of jurisdiction; the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated because it lacked jurisdiction; and the trial court’s entry filed on September 1, 1995, and journalized on September 5, 1995, is reinstated on authority of Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 378, 21 O.O.3d 238, 423 N.E.2d 1105, paragraph one of the syllabus.

It is further ordered that the appellee recover from the appellant its costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Huron County to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Huron County for entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Nader, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Robert A. Nader, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huron App. No. H-95-065. This cause, here on certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Huron County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. The court finds that the record establishes that the notice of appeal from the trial court to the court of appeals was not filed within the time prescribed by App.R. 4(A). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for want of jurisdiction; the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated because it lacked jurisdiction; and the trial court’s entry filed on September 1, 1995, and journalized on September 5, 1995, is reinstated on authority of Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 378, 21 O.O.3d 238, 423 N.E.2d 1105, paragraph one of the syllabus.

It is further ordered that the appellee recover from the appellant its costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Huron County to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Huron County for entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Nader, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Robert A. Nader, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 N.E.2d 946, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vfw-post-1238-v-ohio-liquor-control-comm-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack