Vess v. United Benevolent Society of America

47 S.E. 942, 120 Ga. 411, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 570
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 47 S.E. 942 (Vess v. United Benevolent Society of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vess v. United Benevolent Society of America, 47 S.E. 942, 120 Ga. 411, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 570 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Candler, J.

This was an action to recover benefits under a policy of insurance which provided for the payment of such benefits in the event the insured should “ receive personal bodily injuries, of which there shall be visible signs, effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, by reason of which . . he shall be immediately, wholly, and continuously disabled, so as to cause a total loss of time and prevent him during such disability from attending to or performing all of ,the duties pertaining to his occupation.” It appeared from the evidence that when the plaintiff was injured he was not “ immediately . . disabled, so as to cause, a total loss of time,” but that a period of twenty-four days elapsed from the time of the injury until the plaintiff was first confined to his bed, and that during that period the plaintiff was continuously at his place of business, though not performing the duties usually assigned to him. Held, that the plaintiff’s own evidence failed to bring his case within the terms of the contract of insurance, and that the grant of a nonsuit was proper. Williams v. Preferred Assn., 91 Ga. 698. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. G. H. Brand, for plaintiff, cited Williams v. Preferred Asso., 91 Ga. 698; Young ®. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 80 Me. 244; Wolcott ®. United Ins. Asso., 55 Hun, 98; Sawyer®. U. S. Casualty Co. (Mass.), 8 Am. L. Beg. N. S. 233; Sheanon v. Pac. Mut. Ins. Go., 77 Wis. 618'(20 Am. St.'B. 151); Lord ®. Am. Mut. Acc. Asso.,' 89 Wis. 19 (46 Am. St. B. 815); 1 Am. & Eng. Ene. L. (2d ed.) 296-7; Thornton v. Trav. Ins. Go., 116 Ga. 126; Civil Code, §§ 5347,4995. G. G. Thom'as, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N. Y. v. Barron
30 S.E.2d 879 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Blackshear
28 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Kennard v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of America
160 S.E. 38 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1931)
Federal Life Insurance v. Hurst
160 S.E. 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Smith v. United States National Life & Casualty Co.
281 P. 413 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Lewis v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co. of New York
275 P. 707 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)
O'Brien v. Wise Upson Co., Inc.
143 A. 155 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1928)
Genna v. Continental Casualty Co.
167 Ill. App. 413 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Continental Casualty Co. v. Ogburn
57 So. 852 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Laventhal v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
98 P. 1075 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E. 942, 120 Ga. 411, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vess-v-united-benevolent-society-of-america-ga-1904.