Verret v. Oil Transport Co.
365 U.S. 768, 81 S. Ct. 911, 6 L. Ed. 2d 83, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1302
Opinion
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Verret v. Oil Transport Co., 365 U.S. 768, 81 S. Ct. 911, 6 L. Ed. 2d 83, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1302 (1961).
365 U.S. 768 (Verret v. Oil Transport Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. ($1,923,235.62) IN US CURRENCY
666 N.W.2d 182 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2003)
Guey v. Gulf Insurance
46 F.3d 478 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Railroad Yardmasters of America, Afl-Cio
347 F.2d 983 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Great Cove Realty Co., Inc. v. Harry C. Brenner, District Attorney of County of Suffolk
365 U.S. 769 (Supreme Court, 1961)