St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Railroad Yardmasters of America, Afl-Cio

345 F.2d 181, 59 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5586
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1965
Docket21912_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 181 (St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Railroad Yardmasters of America, Afl-Cio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Railroad Yardmasters of America, Afl-Cio, 345 F.2d 181, 59 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5586 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellee union brought a suit to enjoin the appellant railway from proceeding with its announced intention to abolish certain yardmaster positions. This Court, reversing the district court, held that the dispute between the union and the carrier was within the jurisdiction of the National Railroad Adjustment *182 Board. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Railroad Yardmasters of America, 5 Cir., 328 F.2d 749, cert. den. 377 U.S. 980, 84 S.Ct. 1886, 12 L.Ed.2d 748.

On August 5, 1964, the district court entered a preliminary injunction prohibiting the railroad from abolishing the yardmaster positions at Fort Worth, Texas, pending final determination by the National Railroad Adjustment Board. This appeal was taken by the railroad from the injunctive order, primarily on several jurisdictional grounds.

While the appeal was under submission but was undecided, the National Railway Adjustment Board, on April 8, 1965, made its award sustaining the claim of the yardmasters.

The tribunal which had jurisdiction over the controversy has decided it. The decision of the Board was the event upon which the injunction was conditioned. The injunction is no longer operative and the appeal has become moot. Therefore, the appeal is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dr. Bertrand O. Tyson v. Lt. Clarence J. Cazes
363 F.2d 742 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F.2d 181, 59 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2303, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-san-francisco-railway-company-v-railroad-yardmasters-of-america-ca5-1965.