Vernor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vernor v. State

302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2010 WL 286644

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 2010

DocketED 92724

StatusPublished

This text of 302 S.W.3d 251 (Vernor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vernor v. State, 302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2010 WL 286644 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Vernor appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Vernor appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 76, 2010 WL 286644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernor-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack