Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC

302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 70, 2010 WL 286686
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 26, 2010
DocketED 93116
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 S.W.3d 251 (Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC, 302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 70, 2010 WL 286686 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

*252 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amy Micke (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Commission (Commission) denying unemployment benefits to Claimant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by the facts found by the Commission and the record contains competent evidence to warrant the denial. Partee v. Winco Mfg., Inc., 141 S.W.3d 34, 37 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vernor v. State
302 S.W.3d 251 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 70, 2010 WL 286686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micke-v-aep-river-operations-llc-moctapp-2010.