Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC

302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 70, 2010 WL 286686
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 26, 2010·No. ED 93116·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*252 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amy Micke (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Commission (Commission) denying unemployment benefits to Claimant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by the facts found by the Commission and the record contains competent evidence to warrant the denial. Partee v. Winco Mfg., Inc., 141 S.W.3d 34, 37 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC, 302 S.W.3d 251, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 70, 2010 WL 286686 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

302 S.W.3d 251 (Micke v. Aep River Operations LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vernor v. State
302 S.W.3d 251 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)