Vernon Prince, Agent for Amy Prince v. Gordon Rawls, Sr., D/B/A Rawls Paint and Body Shop

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 8, 2017
DocketA17D0446
StatusPublished

This text of Vernon Prince, Agent for Amy Prince v. Gordon Rawls, Sr., D/B/A Rawls Paint and Body Shop (Vernon Prince, Agent for Amy Prince v. Gordon Rawls, Sr., D/B/A Rawls Paint and Body Shop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vernon Prince, Agent for Amy Prince v. Gordon Rawls, Sr., D/B/A Rawls Paint and Body Shop, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 06, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0446. VERNON PRINCE, AGENT FOR AMY PRINCE v. GORDON RAWLS, SR., d/b/a RAWLS PAINT AND BODY SHOP.

Gordon Rawls, Sr. d/b/a Rawls Paint and Body Shop brought an action seeking to foreclose upon a mechanic’s lien that he had asserted against an automobile owned by Amy Prince. On April 13, 2017, the trial court entered an order ruling that the lien was deemed a valid one and thus allowing foreclosure thereof.1 Seeking to appeal from that order, Vernon Prince, as agent for Amy Prince, filed on May 11, 2017 this discretionary application. Prince cited OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), which encompasses “[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less.” It appears, however, that this case commenced as a foreclosure upon personal property; thus, it is not an “action for damages” within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6- 35 (a) (6) necessitating a discretionary application. See Brown v. Assoc. Financial Svcs. Corp., 255 Ga. 457 (339 SE2d 590) (1986) (no discretionary application required where case commenced as a personal property foreclosure); Kelly v. Pierce Roofing Co., 220 Ga. App. 391, 391 (469 SE2d 469) (1996) (no discretionary application required where action commenced as a materialman’s lien against property). Based upon the materials supplied with this application, the trial court’s order appears to be a final, directly appealable judgment within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). We will grant a timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower

1 See OCGA § 40-3-54 (c) (4). court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED, and Prince shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If Prince has already filed a notice of appeal in the trial court, Prince need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/06/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Associates Financial Services Corp.
339 S.E.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Kelly v. PIERCE ROOFING CO., INC.
469 S.E.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vernon Prince, Agent for Amy Prince v. Gordon Rawls, Sr., D/B/A Rawls Paint and Body Shop, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vernon-prince-agent-for-amy-prince-v-gordon-rawls-sr-dba-rawls-paint-gactapp-2017.