Verner v. Board of Education of Haralson County

47 S.E.2d 500, 203 Ga. 521, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 353
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1948
Docket16155.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 47 S.E.2d 500 (Verner v. Board of Education of Haralson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Verner v. Board of Education of Haralson County, 47 S.E.2d 500, 203 Ga. 521, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 353 (Ga. 1948).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

1. “An action can not be maintained in a name as plaintiff which is neither that of a natural person, a partnership, nor of such artificial person as is recognized by the law as capable of suing. A proceeding commenced in such a name, there being no plaintiff, is not an action, but a mere nullity, and may be dismissed at any time on motion.” Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Dalton Marble Works, 122 Ga. 774 (1) (50 S. E. 978).

2. Under the law of this State, a county board of education is not a natural person, a partnership, or a body corporate with authority to sue or be sued, in the ordinary sense. Accordingly, “the Board of Education of Haralson County” could not as sole plaintiff maintain the present suit for injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with the possession and use of property claimed by it. Code, Ch. 32-9; Code (Ann. Supp.), § 2-6501; Mattox v. Board of Ed. of Liberty County, 148 Ga. 577 (2), 580 (97 S. E. 532, 5 A. L. R. 568); Board of Ed. of Candler County v. Southern Michigan Nat. Bank, 184 Ga. 641 (192 S. E. 382); Board of Ed. of Baker County v. Hall, 189 Ga. 615 (7 S. E. 2d, 183); Board of Ed. for Houston County v. Hunt, 29 Ga. App. 665 (116 S. E. 900); Ayers v. Board of Ed. of Hart County, 56 Ga. App. 146 (192 S. E. 256). See also, in this connection, Smith v. Commissioners of Roads &c. of Glynn County, 198 Ga. 322 (31 S. E. 2d, 648); Ayers v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 106 Fed. (2d), 958.

3. The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. The further proceedings were nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. *522 II. J. McBride, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lance Roofing Co. v. Board of Education
216 S.E.2d 627 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Ray v. Cobb County Board of Education
138 S.E.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Smith v. Maynard
107 S.E.2d 815 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
West v. Manning
92 S.E.2d 4 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Parker v. Bd. of Ed. of Sumter County
70 S.E.2d 369 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E.2d 500, 203 Ga. 521, 1948 Ga. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verner-v-board-of-education-of-haralson-county-ga-1948.