Vern Mac Thogmartin v. Warden Moseley and United States of America
This text of 430 F.2d 1178 (Vern Mac Thogmartin v. Warden Moseley and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
Thogmartin was notified that this court was considering summary affirmance, and he took the opportunity afforded him to file a memorandum opposing such disposition. Nonetheless, examination of the file and records in this cause prompts the conclusion that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the court’s own motion, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order of the district court, 313 F.Supp. 158 (D.Kan. 1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 F.2d 1178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vern-mac-thogmartin-v-warden-moseley-and-united-states-of-america-ca10-1970.