Vermillion v. Parsons

71 S.W. 1092, 98 Mo. App. 72, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 46
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 S.W. 1092 (Vermillion v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vermillion v. Parsons, 71 S.W. 1092, 98 Mo. App. 72, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

GOODE, J.

This appeal concerns the ownership of a piano claimed by Edna Parsons, the interpleader, but attached as the property of her father, L. C. Parsons, the defendant. There was other property involved in the case originally which is no longer in dispute.

Two points are made by the appellant: first, that a demurrer should have been sustained to the inter-pleader’s case; second, that the jury ignored the evidence and found the verdict from prejudice.

The testimony of the interpleader and her mother was that the piano was given to the interpleader by her father when she was seven years of age and while he [75]*75was entirely free from debt; the issue between the attaching creditor and the respondent being as to whether she was the owner in good faith of the instrument, or whether it had been transferred to her by her father in fraud of his creditors.

There was undoubtedly evidence to be submitted to the jury as to whether the interpleader was the true owner and the circuit judge correctly overruled the appellant’s demurrer.

The evidence interposed against the interpleader’s right was deemed so strong by the circuit judge that he set aside one verdict in her favor, but the second trial resulted in the same way. The second verdict could not be set aside on that ground. R. S. 1899, see. 801.

The judgment is affirmed.

Bland, P. J., and Bey-burn, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarkson v. Garvey
161 S.W. 664 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Van Loon v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.
160 S.W. 63 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
O'Donnell v. United Railways Co.
133 S.W. 1165 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.W. 1092, 98 Mo. App. 72, 1903 Mo. App. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vermillion-v-parsons-moctapp-1903.