Vermeer Manufacturing Co. v. Vandiver

650 S.W.2d 244, 279 Ark. 218, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1385
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 9, 1983·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves multiple claims of relief and liability among multiple parties. The trial court dismissed one defendant, Ford Motor Company, on the basis of lack of venue. The other parties now seek to appeal that ruling. However, the order of the trial court does not recite that there is no just reason for delaying an appeal nor does it direct the entry of a final judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company. Therefore, ARCP Rule 54 (b) requires that the present appeal be dismissed without prejudice to appeal when a final judgment is entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vermeer Manufacturing Co. v. Vandiver, 650 S.W.2d 244, 279 Ark. 218, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1385 (Ark. 1983).

650 S.W.2d 244 (Vermeer Manufacturing Co. v. Vandiver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downing v. Lawrence Hall Nursing Center
243 S.W.3d 263 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2006)
Grooms v. Myers
823 S.W.2d 901 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Drake
766 S.W.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)
Tackett v. Robbs
735 S.W.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1987)
Kilcrease v. Butler
724 S.W.2d 169 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1987)
Howard v. Wood Manufacturing Co.
722 S.W.2d 265 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1987)