Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.
This text of 912 So. 2d 380 (Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Verite Antiques, Inc., appeals an adverse final judgment after bench trial. We conclude that the judgment is supported by the record. See Estate of Newman v. [381]*381Newman, 859 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The issues decided were within the pleadings or tried by consent. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190; Rosenberg v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 510 So.2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); The Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Const., Inc., 427 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The evidentiary issues were not the subject of proper objection or proffer in the trial court. See § 90.104, Fla. Stat. (2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16288, 2005 WL 2511520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/verite-antiques-inc-v-chelsea-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-2005.