Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.

912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16288, 2005 WL 2511520

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 2005·No. No. 3D04-3021·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Verite Antiques, Inc., appeals an adverse final judgment after bench trial. We conclude that the judgment is supported by the record. See Estate of Newman v. [381]*381Newman, 859 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The issues decided were within the pleadings or tried by consent. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190; Rosenberg v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 510 So.2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); The Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Const., Inc., 427 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The evidentiary issues were not the subject of proper objection or proffer in the trial court. See § 90.104, Fla. Stat. (2002).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Verite Antiques, Inc., appeals an adverse final judgment after bench trial. We conclude that the judgment is supported by the record. See Estate of Newman v. [381]*381Newman, 859 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The issues decided were within the pleadings or tried by consent. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190; Rosenberg v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 510 So.2d 610, 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); The Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Const., Inc., 427 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The evidentiary issues were not the subject of proper objection or proffer in the trial court. See § 90.104, Fla. Stat. (2002).

Affirmed.

Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc., 912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16288, 2005 WL 2511520 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

912 So. 2d 380 (Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related