Estate of Newman v. Newman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Estate of Newman v. Newman

859 So. 2d 1291, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2003 WL 22799790

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 2003·No. No. 3D03-672·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Estate of Royal B. Newman appeals a final judgment determining that the property settlement agreement between the decedent former husband, and the ap-[1292]*1292pellee former wife, retained its character as property settlement agreement subsequent to the parties’ execution of an addendum to that agreement in 1992. We conclude that the trial court’s findings, entered after an evidentiary hearing, are supported by the record and correctly characterize the agreement. See Salomon v. Salomon, 196 So.2d 111 (Fla.1967); Karch v. Karch, 445 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Estate of Royal B. Newman appeals a final judgment determining that the property settlement agreement between the decedent former husband, and the ap-[1292]*1292pellee former wife, retained its character as property settlement agreement subsequent to the parties’ execution of an addendum to that agreement in 1992. We conclude that the trial court’s findings, entered after an evidentiary hearing, are supported by the record and correctly characterize the agreement. See Salomon v. Salomon, 196 So.2d 111 (Fla.1967); Karch v. Karch, 445 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Estate of Newman v. Newman, 859 So. 2d 1291, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2003 WL 22799790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

859 So. 2d 1291 (Estate of Newman v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related