Estate of Newman v. Newman

859 So. 2d 1291, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2003 WL 22799790
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-672
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 859 So. 2d 1291 (Estate of Newman v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Newman v. Newman, 859 So. 2d 1291, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2003 WL 22799790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Estate of Royal B. Newman appeals a final judgment determining that the property settlement agreement between the decedent former husband, and the ap-[1292]*1292pellee former wife, retained its character as property settlement agreement subsequent to the parties’ execution of an addendum to that agreement in 1992. We conclude that the trial court’s findings, entered after an evidentiary hearing, are supported by the record and correctly characterize the agreement. See Salomon v. Salomon, 196 So.2d 111 (Fla.1967); Karch v. Karch, 445 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verite Antiques, Inc. v. Chelsea Enterprises, Inc.
912 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 So. 2d 1291, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18090, 2003 WL 22799790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-newman-v-newman-fladistctapp-2003.