Vergos v. Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc. (In Re Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc.)

2001 FED App. 0009P, 268 B.R. 127, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1197, 2001 WL 1168161
CourtBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2001
Docket01-8026
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2001 FED App. 0009P (Vergos v. Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc. (In Re Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vergos v. Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc. (In Re Hilburn's Paint & Body Shop, Inc.), 2001 FED App. 0009P, 268 B.R. 127, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1197, 2001 WL 1168161 (bap6 2001).

Opinions

ORDER

AUG, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is the second appeal presented by the United States Trustee on the issue of whether the Bankruptcy Code permits compensation to a debtor’s attorney from the debtor’s estate. In a prior opinion, the Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s interim award of the $1,250.20 in compensation to the debtor’s attorneys. See United States Trustee v. Hilburn’s Paint and Body Shop, Inc. (In re Hilburn’s Paint and Body Shop, Inc.), 253 B.R. 519 (6th Cir. BAP 2000). The United States Trustee now appeals the bankruptcy court’s final order approving administrative claim and disbursement of funds, which includes final approval and disbursement of [128]*128$1,250.20 in compensation to the chapter 7 debtor’s attorneys from the bankruptcy estate.

Upon examination of the record and the briefs, the Panel unanimously agrees that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process in this appeal, and therefore waives oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8012.

Under the law of the case doctrine, a court is ordinarily precluded from re-examining an issue previously decided in the same case. Consolidation Coal Co. v. McMahon, 77 F.3d 898, 905 n. 6. (6th Cir.1996). Because the Panel’s prior decision addressed the same issue presented in this appeal, the law of the case doctrine is applicable to this appeal. Sec In re George Worthington Co., 921 F.2d 626, 628-29 (6th Cir.1990) (“The purpose of the doctrine of law of the case is to promote judicial comity, the judicial system’s interest in finality, and the efficient administration of cases”).

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the Panel’s prior decision, the decision of the bankruptcy court in favor of the appellees is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re TLI, Inc.
292 B.R. 589 (W.D. Michigan, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2001 FED App. 0009P, 268 B.R. 127, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 1197, 2001 WL 1168161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vergos-v-hilburns-paint-body-shop-inc-in-re-hilburns-paint-body-bap6-2001.